Confirm the call and the clock
We collect the guideline PDF, your internal deadline, and a short note on what worries you most—eligibility, evidence, budget fit, or a prior decline.
Review process
From intake folder to ranked findings
A clear sequence so applicants know when to send drafts, when silence means we are reading, and what arrives at the end.
Assemble the reading set
You share the draft dossier and annexes in a shared folder. We freeze the version under review so comments stay attached to one draft.
Map criteria, then read
Reviewers build a criteria sheet, walk the packet against it, and flag contradictions between narrative, budget, and letters of support.
What the report contains
Each full dossier audit returns a findings document with eligibility risks first, then evidence gaps, then clarity notes. Items are ranked so your team can spend limited revision days where scoring is most exposed.
We cite annex titles and page numbers when your files include them. If a criterion has no home in the packet, we say so plainly rather than suggesting decorative language.
After delivery, a one-hour clarification call is included so you can ask how to sequence fixes—not so we can rewrite sections live.
Timing habits that help
- Book at least two weeks before the portal closes for a standard audit
- Send the official scoring grid, not only the marketing brochure for the call
- Label annexes the way the guidelines name them
- Tell us if Thai and English guideline texts differ
Need only a narrow pass? Start with an eligibility check or evidence strength review.